By
We
post a letter from a reader on Preston James’ article. We’ve received
other email as well, some thanking us and some criticizing us.There have been other allegations that some “assassinations” used actors who were not hurt, etc. But the Boston Marathon definitely was not one of them. While it appears to have been a false flag, it did have casualties. Here is Matthew Ward on that black operation:
“The
Illuminati-controlled faction of the CIA still is active in terrorism,
at times in conjunction with law enforcement personnel who unwittingly
are abetting rather than capturing the perpetrators. In addition to
using the few remaining mind-controlled individuals whom they have
programmed, the faction has a list of ‘likely’ persons to blame for
their terrorist activities. They fabricate a plausible foundation around
selective facts about those individuals and feed that story to the
media.
“The bombing at the Boston
marathon was their handiwork. The two brothers ‘alleged’ to be the
bombers fit very well what the faction needed for that occasion. They
had learned about the young men’s interest in simple bomb construction
and, tying that to their ‘radical’ religious convictions and the older
brother’s months in Chechnya and Dagestan, they created ‘suspects’ that
the public would find believable.” (1)
James does not use Perro, uses ad hominem arguments to work on people’s emotions, argues by labelling and repetition, and has many other features which take him outside the standards of the blog. However the thrust of where he’s going is groundbreaking and the articles are history unto themselves. They are an integral part of the massive revelation of the cabal’s activities that we know is occurring.
I haven’t in the past excised portions of opinion pieces like these, (2) such as taking out James’ allegation that the Boston Marathon and Sandy Hook saw no victims/casualties. Usually one prints them in whole or not. I should have added a note at the beginning however.
We’ll reassess whether posting the whole of James’s articles in future does more harm than good. Or posting them at all.
We may in future, print a paragraph or two of a particularly ground-breaking article and refer readers to the VT site for the rest, with a “discernment is required” proviso, as we did today with James’ article on the Department of Homeland Security. The article itself is provocative: Calling for the disbandment of DHS puts anyone on their hit list, I’m sure.
His articles do demonstrate very clearly the
difference between gathering information from “insider” sources and from
channeled sources. If a channeled source wrote like this, we’d never
print it and I’d never draw on it in my articles.Just exactly what happened with James’ article is a major reason why I preferred long ago to go with channeled material. Insider material for me is often such a mixture of truth and polemics. Generally I let others cover it.
James is not the only insider source that writes in fluorid style and doesn’t seem to pay the kind of close attention we’d like to factuality. With other insider commentators too we need to use discernment.
Footnotes
(1) Matthew’s Message, May 12, 2013, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/mattsmessage.htm
(2) With the exception of Zap’s
No comments:
Post a Comment